Non-intelligent design or unintelligent?
Lessee, let’s create a creature who loses hair as he gets older, loses his mental ability, loses…um…other abilities, and hasn’t a clue how great it was to be 17 until it is much, much too late.
T. Rex evolves into a chicken.
http://www.theaustralian.news.com.au/story…00.html
Don’t scientists make you laugh at times.
They say that Intelligent Design is not scientific. All I can say is praise the Lord for that.
So why did T. Rex evolve into a chicken? So that it could rule the jungle better? 
Just think, they refuse to teach Creationism to our children, but they let these morons teach them instead.
Seems to me that scientists should not be allowed outdoors without parental supervision never mind being allowed into shcools.
The story doesn’t say a chicken evolved DIRECTLY from Rex. That’s your embellishment. Dolphins and cattle have almost the same DNA. You’re total lack of understanding this article is indead why you are so gullible in believing in Creationism. The creation story is a myth. Nothing more. All tribes have one. They are all myths. God may or may not exist. The stories made up to support his/her existence are in fact Myths.
Beto
I agree with Beto. Also it was the author of the article, not the scientist, that spun the article this way.
<!–QuoteBegin>
| Quote |
| Don’t scientists make you laugh at times. |
No more than anyone else.
<!–QuoteBegin>
| Quote |
| They say that Intelligent Design is not scientific. |
That’s correct - it is not science.
<!–QuoteBegin>
| Quote |
| Just think, they refuse to teach Creationism to our children, but they let these morons teach them instead. |
What morons - Dr. Schweitzer? She sounds pretty smart to me.
We refuse to allow Creationism to be taught in PUBLIC schools because:
1) It is NOT science
2) It is religous-based in nature.
If you want your kids to learn about Creationism, then send them to a religious school. But don’t expect me, a taxpayer, to allow my money to go to teaching this CRAP!
| Quote (Guest @ April 13 2007,12:08) |
| So why did T. Rex evolve into a chicken? So that it could rule the jungle better?
|
To get to the other side!
Don't let "John" rile you up folks, he's just a troll trolling...
<!–QuoteBegin>
| Quote |
| So why did T. Rex evolve into a chicken? So that it could rule the jungle better? |
or because Adam complained to God about the menu so God provided KFC. It’s all in Genesis.
Beto
<!–QuoteBegin>
| Quote |
| Dolphins and cattle have almost the same DNA. |
Shows you again what idiots scientists are, dolphins are fish, cattle are meat. One needs Tartar Sauce, the other needs Horseradish.
<!–QuoteBegin>
| Quote |
| You’re total lack of understanding this article is indead why you are so gullible in believing in Creationism. |
That should be your not you’re, and try indeed instead of indead. I suppose you’re a scientist are you Beto? And I suppose you want to teach our children English too?
Dolphins are mammals, “John.”
Mammal is just a definition TomS, and not one that’s in the Bible. Tartar sauce however is real. And believe me, it goes much better with barbecued dolphin than horseradish does. Ipso facto, dolphin is a fish. 
So “John” isn’t John from Texas?
I’ve only passed through Texas Mr Soul, usually as quickly as possible; so it’s only after I’ve left it that I’m from there.
According to TomS Dolphins are mammals, and according to Bluto in Phoenix, so are cows. And monkeys too according to Darwin.
Have you ever heard anything so ridiculous?
How many cows have you seen swinging in the treetops? Tarzan of the Frisians, I don’t think so.
And why did some monkeys evolve into fish? One of them dropped a banana in a river or something?
And if monkeys evolved into humans (and dolphins), why are there still monkeys around?
And if monkeys are our relatives, how come more folks don’t invite them round for Thanksgiving?
It’s all just too stupid to think about.
Creationism provides a perfectly reasonable explanation for why what is what.
Instead of trying to figure out other more complicated explanations, use your time to get laid instead.
Trust me, you’ll enjoy it much more. 
Hey, John, did you see the report where they found a handax associated with 300,000 year old burials of Homo Heidelbergensis over in Spain? Those folks were already thinking about death 'way back then. And the 90,000 year old Neanderthal burial where the body was covered with the petals from 8 different species of flowers - I find that stuff amazing.
uh…what was the question?
John, you are named properly. After a crapper no doubt.
You must have retained mucho head trauma as you mother and father tried in vain to flush you at birth.
Is everyone in your family an inbred idiot or do you claim that privelege solely for yourself?
Surley the only impressive thing about you is how you’ve managed to survive so long.
<!–QuoteBegin>
| Quote |
| Those folks were already thinking about death 'way back then. |
Or could’ve been those folks were thinking, “How in h e l l do I dispose of of all my broken hand ax garbage?”
<!–QuoteBegin>
| Quote |
| Homo Heidelbergensis |
They really called themselves that? Sheeeit! They may not have mastered fire, but they sure had a comprehensive vocabulary sorted out!
Beto, just in case you missed it, “John” refers to the beloved apostle here, I think; let us not dirty the good name of Crapper.
Re: early vocabulary - I once read an interesting comment, to the effect that early humans were making the same tools over and over again, and if they were indeed talking, it is likely that it was a pretty boring conversation. The same thing over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over…
| Quote (TomS @ April 14 2007,09:49) |
| ...if they were indeed talking, it is likely that it was a pretty boring conversation. The same thing over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over... |
Sounds familiar.
No…really?
<!–QuoteBegin>
| Quote |
| Beto, just in case you missed it, “John” refers to the beloved apostle here, I think; let us not dirty the good name of Crapper. |
No biblical reference there TomS, I was just the first of four sons my parents had. Paul and George came next. Hey! I’ve just realized, Bongo in Phoenix might be my long lost baby brother.
<!–QuoteBegin>
| Quote |
| Re: early vocabulary - I once read an interesting comment, to the effect that early humans were making the same tools over and over again, and if they were indeed talking, it is likely that it was a pretty boring conversation. The same thing over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over… |
…And then some very dexterous wiseacre crafted the first ever flint corkscrew and then the conversation became deeply interesting, still crap, but it sure sounded good at the time.
Ah, yes, the inventor of the Flint corkscrew - that was either Dallas Dort or Henry Crapo - a little local controversy there - but for my money it was Crapo, 'cause the timeline wouldn’t fit otherwise.
I thought it went: John, Paul, George, Harpo, Gummo, Zeppo?
OK, quiz time: name all of the 3 stooges. Hint: there were 6.
SO I’ve just proven 3 = 6. You can thank me later.
Off to the TV to watch Buffalo bury the Islanders!