<!–QuoteBegin>
Quote |
Just make sure you wear a wrapper so you don’t get VST LOL |
Still suffering from GAS… - no cure found yet?
regards, Nils
<!–QuoteBegin>
Quote |
Just make sure you wear a wrapper so you don’t get VST LOL |
Quote (Nils K @ April 06 2006,06:54) |
Just make sure you wear a wrapper so you don't get VST LOL |
Btw - Bubba, what’s the sampling frequency and bit depth that the MOBO runs at ?
Bubba is not married Wihan… so the sampling is probably a higher rate than us old married geezers… bit depth? Er… personally I’m afraid my answer would come up short.
D
Hahahahaha !
I’m also told that it’s not totally the bit depth, but rather the throughput that makes a good DAW …
Is this thread ever gonna return to normal ?
After 7 years with the same lady… I might as well be married. Though you care much less about the sampling rate and much more about getting a good performance.
I worked and worked at IT and I still don’t have IT right…
The more you practice IT the the less you have to work at IT… to get IT right…
Well… that’s what I heard her say… Mabey she was talking about something else…
Bill…
Ya know, I have just started to use the complete 24 bit depth of my driver. But whenever I push the full 24, I get a grunt noise. So if I back down to 16 , I tend to get easier tracking and a more responsive result. As far as frequency, I find that 192K will help me get the result I want, whenever I want. And as far as wrappers, I don’t think I get the feel I want when I use them and I never like dealing with STD… er VSTs.
The funny thing is that even though I am married to a musician, I tend to do my best work alone. It just seems easier getting the job done more quickly when I am not spreading my attention too much. Focus is everything.
Uhhh…
Bumping back to stable COMPUTER rigs.
I guess in these cases longer latency is better. Nothing worse than a 4ms return. Just over too quickly.
2ms when using virtual instruments and no worry about catching VST. Yes applying virtual instruments is a good substitute if you are faSoft
Quote (StuH @ April 06 2006,18:49) |
Yes applying virtual instruments is a good substitute if you are faSoft |
Quote (Bubbagump @ April 06 2006,20:33) | ||
Well done! |