Saddam 'Might' Be Gone

The Lurchurian Candidate does it again

Kerry Says Saddam ‘Might Be Gone’ - Had He Been President

Fri Oct 29 2004 10:02:35 ET
NBCNEWS - Brokaw interviewed John Kerry Thursday evening.

Brokaw: "If you had been President, Saddam Hussein would be in power."

Kerry: “Not necessarily.” :laugh:

Brokaw: "You said you wouldn’t go to war against him."

Kerry: “That’s not true.{ Lie }
Under the inspection process, Saddam was required to destroy those kinds of materials and weapons.” :laugh:
{ Won’t answer question - “If you had been President, Saddam Hussein would be in power.” }

Brokaw: "But he wasn’t destroying them."

Kerry: “That’s what you have inspectors for. { Clouseau } :laugh:
That’s why I voted for { before he voted against } the threat of force, because he only does things when you have a legitimate threat of force. It’s irresponsible to suggest that if I were President, he wouldn’t be gone. He might be gone, because if he hadn’t complied, we might have had to go to war, but if we did, we would have gone with allies { France, Germany and Russia were being payed off U.N. Oil for Food Scandal and already said they wouldn’t} , so the American people weren’t carrying the entire burden. And the entire world would understand why we did it { They understand !! }.”

Ali bin Gali :cool:
The Lurchurian Candidate - Supported by al Qaeda, al Jazeera and al Gore


FOX News Bush +5
Reuters/Zogby TIE
GW/Battleground Bush +5
ABC/Wash Post Bush +1
ICR Bush +3
CNN/USAT/Gallup Bush +5
Newsweek Bush +2