Woo hoo!!
Heh, heh…April Fools…
TG
PS I apologize. The devil made me do it!
I wish I would have seen this sooner. now my posting above seems a little copycat-ish. bah. slaps self with wet seabass
| Quote (silvermachina @ April 01 2005,12:26) |
| I wish I would have seen this sooner. now my posting above seems a little copycat-ish. bah. *slaps self with wet seabass* |
Oh well, it never gets old, anyway. 
Tony
damnit, you actually had me excited.
N-track on a real OS.
I shudder to think
| Quote (clark_griswold @ April 01 2005,16:39) |
| damnit, you actually had me excited. N-track on a real OS. I shudder to think |
Can you say Pro-Tools slayer? I thought you could!
Well, it might not SLAY, but it'd be darn fine and MUCH cheaper!
Sorry if I got yer blood pressure up!
TG
| Quote (clark_griswold @ April 01 2005,16:39) |
| damnit, you actually had me excited. N-track on a real OS. I shudder to think |
Eh, Mac OSX is simply KDE with more gradients.
nevertheless, it’s better than bloatware…I mean, Xp.
Okay, I am taking this totally left field, but I find OSX slow and clunky. Is it just me? This is on a G4 with 512MB of RAM, so maybe that is not a good test. I don’t know. But 10.3.5 is pokey on that box.
My Mac experience is almost nil, so I can’t really make a fair comment. I did read a review once of a G5 Dual 2.5 running Logic. The dude had a goshawful amount of audio and midi tracks and a truckload of effects running smooth as glass. It certainly sounded impressive in the article. Can’t remember what audio interface he was running…hmmm… Anyway, a nice, lean, intuitive package like n-Track on Mac OSX would just have to be smokin’ !!!
TG
Yeah, my experience has been with everything Adobe. Illustrator and the like just seem to eat the machine.