Quote (TomS @ April 25 2006,21:08) |
Bill, I don't remember having a good laugh, but I suspect I did, in a strictly friendly way. By the way, didn't your letter contain a false dichotomy? ONe can be for peace in the instant case but not in all cases. Not all of us who have said that the present war is a mistake thought, e.g., that Afghanistan was a mistake - I think that one was justified. |
Tom,
Your laugh was definitely done in a friendly way and I was in no sense offended by it, I apologize if I gave any other impression.
A false dichotomy? I suppose you are right. However, that letter was written in response to war protests that had recently been held in the city and reported upon by that paper - I perceived the tone of the protests as being anti-war under any circumstances (Stratford is a small city and it was apparent that a majority of the protesters were the same people who had protested the Afganistan invasion).
I am pro-peace but acknowledge that war is sometimes a 'necessary evil' and I made reference to WWII since I believe most people now agree that it was a justified war (though it had its share of objectors at the time).
I suppose I now owe the protestors an apology - they were right and I was wrong. At the time, I naively believed that if your president claimed to have information that justified his actions then his decision should be supported. I believed he would be an honourable man and if it turned out he was wrong he would bear the consequence of that error and resign. That's what led to the 'buck stops here' question (and your well-deserved chortle response).
Like I said, I was naive.